Showing information for HMDB0000208 ('alpha-ketoglutaric acid', 'oxoglutaric acid', 'alpha-ketoglutarate', '2-ketoglutaric acid', '2-oxoglutarate')


Metabolite information

HMDB ID HMDB0000208
Synonyms
2-Ketoglutarate
2-Ketoglutaric acid
2-Oxoglutarate
2-Oxoglutaric acid
2-Oxopentanedioate
2-Oxopentanedioic acid
2-oxo-1,5-Pentanedioate
2-oxo-1,5-Pentanedioic acid
Calcium alpha-ketoglutarate
Calcium ketoglutarate
Oxoglutarate
a-Ketoglutarate
a-Ketoglutaric acid
alpha-Ketoglutarate
alpha-Ketoglutaric acid
alpha-Ketoglutaric acid, calcium salt (2:1)
alpha-Ketoglutaric acid, diammonium salt
alpha-Ketoglutaric acid, dipotassium salt
alpha-Ketoglutaric acid, disodium salt
alpha-Ketoglutaric acid, monopotassium salt
alpha-Ketoglutaric acid, monosodium salt
alpha-Ketoglutaric acid, potassium salt
alpha-Ketoglutaric acid, sodium salt
alpha-Oxoglutarate
α-ketoglutarate
α-ketoglutaric acid
Chemical formula C5H6O5
IUPAC name
2-oxopentanedioic acid
CAS registry number 328-50-7
Monoisotopic molecular weight 146.021523302

Chemical taxonomy

Super class Organic acids and derivatives
Class Keto acids and derivatives
Sub class Gamma-keto acids and derivatives

Biological properties

Pathways (Pathway Details in HMDB)

The paper(s) that report HMDB0000208 as a lung cancer biomarker

The studies that identify HMDB0000208 as a lung cancer-related metabolite


Reference Country Specimen Marker function Participants (Case) Participants (Control)
Cancer type Stage Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status Type Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status
Miyamoto et al. 2015 US blood diagnosis NSCLC, SCLC, mesothelioma, secondary metastasis to lung I, II, III, IV 11 4, 7 67 (61-73) / 67 (47-76) smoker, non-smoker healthy 11 5, 6 69 (61-83) / 54 (44-61) unknown
Mazzone et al. 2016 US serum adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma I, II, III 94 55.3%, 44.7% 68.7 at-risk controls 190 50.5%, 49.5% 66.2
Hori et al. 2011 Japan tissue diagnosis adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, SCLC 7 6, 1 median: 61 (53-82) smoker, non-smoker tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 7 6, 1 median: 61 (53-82) smoker, non-smoker
Wikoff et al. 2015b US tissue diagnosis adenocarcinoma I 39 15, 24 72.33 ± 8.78 smoker, non-smoker tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 39 15, 24 72.33 ± 8.78 smoker, non-smoker
Hao et al. 2016 Canada serum diagnosis lung cancer I, II, III, IV 25 15, 10 64 (42–77) smoker, non-smoker before vs. after treatment (radiation treatment) smoker, non-smoker
Moreno et al. 2018 Spain tissue therapy, diagnosis squamous cell carcinoma I, II, III 35 35, 0 68.71 ± 7.46 tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 35 35, 0 68.71 ± 7.46
Qi et al. 2021 China blood diagnosis adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, small cell lung cancer, other types, unknown types I, II, III, IV 98 51, 47 Median: 50 (32-69) healthy 75 36, 39 Median: 50 (31-69)
Reference Chromatography Ion source Positive/Negative mode Mass analyzer Identification level
Miyamoto et al. 2015 GC EI TOF MS/MS
Mazzone et al. 2016 GC EI quadrupole MS/MS
Hori et al. 2011 GC
Wikoff et al. 2015b GC EI TOF
Hao et al. 2016 NMR
Moreno et al. 2018 LC, GC ESI, EI both LC: linear ion-trap, GC: single-quadrupole LC: MS/MS
Qi et al. 2021 LC ESI both Q-Orbitrap MS/MS
Reference Data processing software Database search
Miyamoto et al. 2015 ChromaTOF software (Leco) UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Mazzone et al. 2016 Metabolon LIMS system Metabolon LIMS system
Hori et al. 2011 Shimadzu GCMSsolution software commercially available GC/MS Metabolite Mass Spectral Database (Shimadzu Co.), NIST Mass Spectral Library (NIST 08)
Wikoff et al. 2015b BinBase NIST11, BinBase
Hao et al. 2016 Chenomx NMR Suite 7.1, Metabolite Detector
Moreno et al. 2018 KEGG, HMDB
Qi et al. 2021 ProteoWizard, XCMS, Xcalibur, CAMERA mzCloud, ChemSpider, LipidBlast and Fiehn HILIC
Reference Difference method Mean concentration (case) Mean concentration (control) Fold change (case/control) P-value FDR VIP
Miyamoto et al. 2015 Analysis of Covariance 564.090909090909 653.545454545455 0.86 0.30
Mazzone et al. 2016 two- sample independent t test 0.9707989± 0.6326111 0.9231879± 0.5633581 1.05 0.52 0.59
Hori et al. 2011 student’s t-test, PLS-DA 0.84 0.32
Wikoff et al. 2015b OPLS-DA 1.00 0.84
Hao et al. 2016 OPLS-DA, CV-ANOVA >1
Moreno et al. 2018 paired two-sample t-test, PLS-DA 1.07 0.36 0.40
Qi et al. 2021 PCA, OPLS-DA, Student’s t test 1.13 0.03 2.66
Reference Classification method Cutoff value AUROC 95%CI Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%)
Miyamoto et al. 2015
Mazzone et al. 2016
Hori et al. 2011
Wikoff et al. 2015b
Hao et al. 2016
Moreno et al. 2018
Qi et al. 2021