Showing information for HMDB0000076 ('5,6-dihydrouracil', 'dihydrouracil')


Metabolite information

HMDB ID HMDB0000076
Synonyms
2,4-Dioxotetrahydropyrimidine
5,6-Dihydrouracil
5,6-dihydro-2,4(1H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione
5,6-dihydro-2,4-Dihydroxypyrimidine
DIHYDROPYRIMIDINE-2,4(1H,3H)-dione
Dihydrouracile
Hydrouracil
dihydro-2,4(1H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione
dihydro-Pyrimidine-2,4-dione
Chemical formula C4H6N2O2
IUPAC name
1,3-diazinane-2,4-dione
CAS registry number 504-07-4
Monoisotopic molecular weight 114.042927446

Chemical taxonomy

Super class Organoheterocyclic compounds
Class Diazines
Sub class Pyrimidines and pyrimidine derivatives

Biological properties

Pathways (Pathway Details in HMDB)

The paper(s) that report HMDB0000076 as a lung cancer biomarker

The studies that identify HMDB0000076 as a lung cancer-related metabolite


Reference Country Specimen Marker function Participants (Case) Participants (Control)
Cancer type Stage Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status Type Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status
Ro?-Mazurczyk et al. 2017 Poland serum diagnosis adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma I, II, III 31 17, 14 52-72 healthy 92 52, 40 52-73
Wikoff et al. 2015b US tissue diagnosis adenocarcinoma I 39 15, 24 72.33 ± 8.78 smoker, non-smoker tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 39 15, 24 72.33 ± 8.78 smoker, non-smoker
Moreno et al. 2018 Spain tissue therapy, diagnosis squamous cell carcinoma I, II, III 35 35, 0 68.71 ± 7.46 tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 35 35, 0 68.71 ± 7.46
Moreno et al. 2018 Spain tissue therapy, diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III 33 24, 9 62.11 ± 9.73 tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 33 24, 9 62.11 ± 9.73
Reference Chromatography Ion source Positive/Negative mode Mass analyzer Identification level
Ro?-Mazurczyk et al. 2017 GC TOF In-source fragmentation
Wikoff et al. 2015b GC EI TOF
Moreno et al. 2018 LC, GC ESI, EI both LC: linear ion-trap, GC: single-quadrupole LC: MS/MS
Moreno et al. 2018 LC, GC ESI, EI both LC: linear ion-trap, GC: single-quadrupole LC: MS/MS
Reference Data processing software Database search
Ro?-Mazurczyk et al. 2017 Leco ChromaTOF-GC Replib, Mainlib and Fiehn libraries
Wikoff et al. 2015b BinBase NIST11, BinBase
Moreno et al. 2018 KEGG, HMDB
Moreno et al. 2018 KEGG, HMDB
Reference Difference method Mean concentration (case) Mean concentration (control) Fold change (case/control) P-value FDR VIP
Ro?-Mazurczyk et al. 2017 two-sample T test, U Mann-Whitney test, Benjamini-Hochberg approach 3.7831 ± 2.8928 5.8847 ± 7.2572 0.64 0.19 0.52
Wikoff et al. 2015b OPLS-DA 2.40 2.40e-07
Moreno et al. 2018 paired two-sample t-test, PLS-DA 3.78 1.60e-14 4.13e-13
Moreno et al. 2018 paired two-sample t-test, PLS-DA 3.12 2.61e-12 3.81e-10
Reference Classification method Cutoff value AUROC 95%CI Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%)
Ro?-Mazurczyk et al. 2017 ROC curve
Wikoff et al. 2015b
Moreno et al. 2018
Moreno et al. 2018