Showing information for HMDB0240773 ('acetyl-DL-carnitine')

Metabolite information
HMDB ID HMDB0240773
Synonyms
(+-)-Acetylcarnitine
(-)-Acetylcarnitine
(R)-Acetylcarnitine
3-(Acetyloxy)-4-(trimethylammonio)butanoate
3-(Acetyloxy)-4-(trimethylammonio)butanoic acid
ALCAR
Acetyl L carnitine
Acetyl carnitine
Acetyl-DL-carnitine
Acetyl-L-(-)-carnitine
Acetyl-L-carnitine
Acetyl-carnitine
Acetylcarnitine
Acetylcarnitine, (R)-isomer
Branigen
Carnitine, acetyl
DL-O-Acetylcarnitine
Glaxo brand OF acetyl L carnitine
Glaxo brand OF acetyl L-carnitine
L-Carnitine acetyl ester
L-O-Acetylcarnitine
Levocarnitine acetyl
Medosan
Nicetile
O-Acetyl-L-carnitine
O-Acetylcarnitine
Sigma tau brand OF acetyl L carnitine
Sigma-tau brand OF acetyl L-carnitine
Chemical formula C9H17NO4
IUPAC name
3-(acetyloxy)-4-(trimethylazaniumyl)butanoate
CAS registry number –
Monoisotopic molecular weight 203.115758037

Chemical taxonomy
Super class Lipids and lipid-like molecules
Class Fatty Acyls
Sub class Fatty acid esters

Biological properties
Pathways (Pathway Details in HMDB)

The paper(s) that report HMDB0240773 as a lung cancer biomarker

The studies that identify HMDB0240773 as a lung cancer-related metabolite

Reference Country Specimen Marker function Participants (Case) Participants (Control)
Cancer type Stage Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status Type Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status
Zhao et al. 2021 China Serum diagnosis LCC, ADC, SCC, SCLC I, II, III, IV 39 21, 23 – – healthy control 40 18, 27 – –
Reference Chromatography Ion source Positive/Negative mode Mass analyzer Identification level
Zhao et al. 2021 LC ESI both Q-TOF MS/MS
Reference Data processing software Database search
Zhao et al. 2021 XCMS, CAMERA, metaX KEGG, HMDB
Reference Difference method Mean concentration (case) Mean concentration (control) Fold change (case/control) P-value FDR VIP
Zhao et al. 2021 Student’s t-test, PLS-DA, – – 2.96 1.34e-05 – 2.89
Reference Classification method Cutoff value AUROC 95%CI Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%)
Zhao et al. 2021 – – – – – –