Metabolite information |
|
| HMDB ID | - |
| Synonyms |
- |
| Chemical formula | - |
| IUPAC name | - |
| CAS registry number | - |
| Monoisotopic molecular weight | - |
Chemical taxonomy |
|
| Super class | - |
| Class | - |
| Sub class | - |
Biological properties |
|
| Pathways |
- |
| Reference | Country | Specimen | Marker function | Participants (Case) | Participants (Control) | |||||||||
| Cancer type | Stage | Number | Gender (M,F) | Age mean (range) (M/F) | Smoking status | Type | Number | Gender (M,F) | Age mean (range) (M/F) | Smoking status | ||||
| Wang et al. 2014 | China | exhaled breath | diagnosis | adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma | I, II, IV | 18 | 13, 5 | 58.67 ± 6.34 | smoker | tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue (postoperative contralateral vs. ipsilateral) | 18 | 13, 5 | 58.67 ± 6.34 | smoker |
| Wang et al. 2014 | China | exhaled breath | diagnosis | adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma | I, II, IV | 18 | 13, 5 | 58.67 ± 6.34 | smoker | tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue (preoperative contralateral vs. ipsilateral) | 18 | 13, 5 | 58.67 ± 6.34 | smoker |
| Wang et al. 2014 | China | exhaled breath | diagnosis | adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma | I, II, IV | 18 | 13, 5 | 58.67 ± 6.34 | smoker | before vs. after treatment (operation) | 18 | 13, 5 | 58.67 ± 6.34 | smoker |
| Reference | Chromatography | Ion source | Positive/Negative mode | Mass analyzer | Identification level |
| Wang et al. 2014 | GC | EI | – | – | – |
| Wang et al. 2014 | GC | EI | – | – | – |
| Wang et al. 2014 | GC | EI | – | – | – |
| Reference | Data processing software | Database search |
| Wang et al. 2014 | XCMS | – |
| Wang et al. 2014 | XCMS | – |
| Wang et al. 2014 | XCMS | – |
| Reference | Difference method | Mean concentration (case) | Mean concentration (control) | Fold change (case/control) | P-value | FDR | VIP |
| Wang et al. 2014 | PCA, PLS-DA, OPLS-DA, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test | – | – | 16.45 | 6.98e-04 | – | 1.48 |
| Wang et al. 2014 | PCA, PLS-DA, OPLS-DA, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Wang et al. 2014 | PCA, PLS-DA, OPLS-DA, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Reference | Classification method | Cutoff value | AUROC 95%CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) |
| Wang et al. 2014 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Wang et al. 2014 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Wang et al. 2014 | – | – | – | – | – | – |