Showing information for HMDB0004136 ('threitol')


Metabolite information

HMDB ID HMDB0004136
Synonyms
(-)-Threitol
(R*,r*)-1,2,3,4-butanetetrol
D-threo-Tetritol
Threit
Threitol
Threitol, ((r*,r*)-(+-))-isomer
Threitol, (R-(r*,r*))-isomer
Chemical formula C4H10O4
IUPAC name
(2R,3R)-butane-1,2,3,4-tetrol
CAS registry number 2418-52-2
Monoisotopic molecular weight 122.057908808

Chemical taxonomy

Super class Organic oxygen compounds
Class Organooxygen compounds
Sub class Carbohydrates and carbohydrate conjugates

Biological properties

Pathways (Pathway Details in HMDB)

The paper(s) that report HMDB0004136 as a lung cancer biomarker

The studies that identify HMDB0004136 as a lung cancer-related metabolite


Reference Country Specimen Marker function Participants (Case) Participants (Control)
Cancer type Stage Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status Type Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status
Miyamoto et al. 2015 US blood diagnosis NSCLC, SCLC, mesothelioma, secondary metastasis to lung I, II, III, IV 11 4, 7 67 (61-73) / 67 (47-76) smoker, non-smoker healthy 11 5, 6 69 (61-83) / 54 (44-61) unknown
Miyamoto et al. 2015 US blood diagnosis adenocarcinoma unknown (mostly late stage) 18 10, 8 67 (50-85) / 62 (53-72) former, current healthy 20 8, 12 64 (49-80) / 66 (58-82) former, current
Mazzone et al. 2016 US serum adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma I, II, III 94 55.3%, 44.7% 68.7 at-risk controls 190 50.5%, 49.5% 66.2
Fahrmann et al. 2015 US plasma diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 43 21, 22 67.3 ± 10.10 healthy 43 21, 22 65.9 ± 8.05
Fahrmann et al. 2015 US serum diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 43 21, 22 67.3 ± 10.10 healthy 43 21, 22 65.9 ± 8.05
Fahrmann et al. 2015 US plasma diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 52 17, 35 65.9 ± 9.66 healthy 31 11, 20 64.1 ± 8.97
Fahrmann et al. 2015 US serum diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 49 17, 32 65.9 ± 9.87 healthy 31 11, 20 64.1 ± 8.97
Wikoff et al. 2015b US tissue diagnosis adenocarcinoma I 39 15, 24 72.33 ± 8.78 smoker, non-smoker tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 39 15, 24 72.33 ± 8.78 smoker, non-smoker
Sun et al. 2019 China serum diagnosis lung cancer I, II, III, IV 31 21, 10 54.1 ± 9.9 smoker, non-smoker healthy 29 15, 14 52.1 ± 14.6 smoker, non-smoker
Reference Chromatography Ion source Positive/Negative mode Mass analyzer Identification level
Miyamoto et al. 2015 GC EI TOF MS/MS
Miyamoto et al. 2015 GC EI TOF MS/MS
Mazzone et al. 2016 GC EI quadrupole MS/MS
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Wikoff et al. 2015b GC EI TOF
Sun et al. 2019 GC
Reference Data processing software Database search
Miyamoto et al. 2015 ChromaTOF software (Leco) UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Miyamoto et al. 2015 ChromaTOF software (Leco) UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Mazzone et al. 2016 Metabolon LIMS system Metabolon LIMS system
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Wikoff et al. 2015b BinBase NIST11, BinBase
Sun et al. 2019 BinBase, KEGG
Reference Difference method Mean concentration (case) Mean concentration (control) Fold change (case/control) P-value FDR VIP
Miyamoto et al. 2015 Analysis of Covariance 1619.72727272727 1800.63636363636 0.90 0.21
Miyamoto et al. 2015 Analysis of Covariance 1812.11111111111 1618.4 1.12 0.68
Mazzone et al. 2016 two- sample independent t test 1.139887± 0.9612257 1.263906± 0.8927664 0.90 0.28 0.40
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 197 ± 121 206 ± 92 0.96 0.40 0.66
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 321 ± 249 316 ± 148 1.01 0.79 0.94
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 333 ± 305 341 ± 198 0.98 0.47 0.78
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 346 ± 272 387 ± 223 0.89 0.14 0.49
Wikoff et al. 2015b OPLS-DA 1.10 0.18
Sun et al. 2019 Student t test, PLS-DA 4.05 1.06e-10 3.58e-09 1.35
Reference Classification method Cutoff value AUROC 95%CI Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%)
Miyamoto et al. 2015
Miyamoto et al. 2015
Mazzone et al. 2016
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest
Wikoff et al. 2015b
Sun et al. 2019 ROC curve analysis