Showing paper detailed information


Citation Information


Analytical methods

Comparative study #1 #2
Chromatography GC GC
Ion source EI EI
Positive/Negative mode
Mass analyzer
Identification level

Sample information

Comparative study #1 #2
Country Germany Germany
Specimen exhaled breath exhaled breath
Marker function diagnosis diagnosis
Participants(Case) Cancer type NSCLC, SCLC NSCLC, SCLC
Stage
Number1212
Gender (M,F)11, 111, 1
Mean age (range) (M,F)
Smoking status
Participants(Control) Type healthy healthy
Number2424
Gender (M,F)10, 1410, 14
Mean age (range) (M,F)
Smoking statussmoker, non-smokersmoker, non-smoker

Data processing and metabolite identification

Data processing software
Database search

Statistical analysis

Differential analysis method
Classification method
Survival analysis method

Lung cancer-related metabolites identified in the paper

Metabolite Author-emphasized biomarkers Mean concentration (case) Mean concentration (control) Fold change (case/control) P-value FDR VIP
nonanal 0.03
octanal 0.01
hexanal 6.00e-03
pentanal 1.00e-03
CEA
CYFRA 21-1
NSE
Metabolite Author-emphasized biomarkers Cutoff value AUROC (95%CI) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%)
nonanal 8.433 nmol/L 33.3 95.8
octanal 1.068 nmol/L 58.3 91.7
hexanal 1.208 nmol/L 8.3 91.7
pentanal 0.275 nmol/L 75 95.8
CEA 5.61 ng/mL 58.3 95.7
CYFRA 21-1 3.34 ng/mL 66.7 100
NSE 22.85 ng/mL 50 91.3

Paper graphical summary