Analytical methods | ||
---|---|---|
Comparative study | #1 | |
Chromatography | GC | |
Ion source | EI | |
Positive/Negative mode | positive | |
Mass analyzer | single quad | |
Identification level | – |
Sample information | ||
---|---|---|
Comparative study | #1 | |
Country | China | |
Specimen | pleural effusion | |
Marker function | diagnosis | |
Participants(Case) | Cancer type | NSCLC, SCLC |
Stage | – | |
Number | 20 | |
Gender (M,F) | 16, 4 | |
Mean age (range) (M,F) | 73 (53-85) | |
Smoking status | – | |
Participants(Control) | Type | tuberculous pleurisy, pneumonia |
Number | 20 | |
Gender (M,F) | 14, 6 | |
Mean age (range) (M,F) | 63.6 (44-86) | |
Smoking status | – |
Data processing and metabolite identification | |
---|---|
Data processing software | – |
Database search | NIST02 library |
Statistical analysis | |
---|---|
Differential analysis method | Student's t-test, corrected t-test |
Classification method | – |
Survival analysis method | – |
Metabolite | Author-emphasized biomarkers | Mean concentration (case) | Mean concentration (control) | Fold change (case/control) | P-value | FDR | VIP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-ethyl-1-hexanol | – | 1373900 ± 1112200 | 65000 ± 55500 | 21.10 | 1.00e-02 | – | – |
longifolene | – | 1500 ± 1400 | 700 ± 500 | 2.20 | 0.04 | – | – |
2-phenyl-2-propanol | – | 26300 ± 26100 | 1800 ± 1100 | 14.00 | 0.03 | – | – |
cyclohexanone | – | 2800700 ± 2566000 | 158700 ± 149200 | 17.50 | 3.00e-03 | – | – |
1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene | – | 50200 ± 50300 | 6500 ± 5400 | 7.70 | 5.00e-03 | – | – |
Metabolite | Author-emphasized biomarkers | Cutoff value | AUROC (95%CI) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-ethyl-1-hexanol | – | – | – | – | – | – |
longifolene | – | – | – | – | – | – |
2-phenyl-2-propanol | – | – | – | – | – | – |
cyclohexanone | – | – | – | – | – | – |
1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene | – | – | – | – | – | – |