Showing paper detailed information


Citation Information


Analytical methods

Comparative study #1
Chromatography GC
Ion source EI
Positive/Negative mode positive
Mass analyzer single quad
Identification level

Sample information

Comparative study #1
Country China
Specimen pleural effusion
Marker function diagnosis
Participants(Case) Cancer type NSCLC, SCLC
Stage
Number20
Gender (M,F)16, 4
Mean age (range) (M,F)73 (53-85)
Smoking status
Participants(Control) Type tuberculous pleurisy, pneumonia
Number20
Gender (M,F)14, 6
Mean age (range) (M,F)63.6 (44-86)
Smoking status

Data processing and metabolite identification

Data processing software
Database search NIST02 library

Statistical analysis

Differential analysis method Student's t-test, corrected t-test
Classification method
Survival analysis method

Lung cancer-related metabolites identified in the paper

Metabolite Author-emphasized biomarkers Mean concentration (case) Mean concentration (control) Fold change (case/control) P-value FDR VIP
2-ethyl-1-hexanol 1373900 ± 1112200 65000 ± 55500 21.10 1.00e-02
longifolene 1500 ± 1400 700 ± 500 2.20 0.04
2-phenyl-2-propanol 26300 ± 26100 1800 ± 1100 14.00 0.03
cyclohexanone 2800700 ± 2566000 158700 ± 149200 17.50 3.00e-03
1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene 50200 ± 50300 6500 ± 5400 7.70 5.00e-03
Metabolite Author-emphasized biomarkers Cutoff value AUROC (95%CI) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%)
2-ethyl-1-hexanol
longifolene
2-phenyl-2-propanol
cyclohexanone
1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene

Paper graphical summary